BP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kosmos Energy has a net margin of -4.28% compared to BP PLC's net margin of -1.66%. BP PLC's return on equity of 0.46% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 16.82%.

BP PLC has a consensus price target of $38.30, signalling upside risk potential of 14.71%. On the other hand Kosmos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 129.34%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than BP PLC, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than BP PLC.

BP PLC has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kosmos Energy has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.485%.

BP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Kosmos Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BP PLC pays 1313.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Kosmos Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BP PLC quarterly revenues are $45.8B, which are larger than Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues of $397.6M. BP PLC's net income of -$2B is lower than Kosmos Energy's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, BP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 406.20x while Kosmos Energy's PE ratio is 5.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP PLC is 0.49x versus 0.64x for Kosmos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -4.28% compared to BP PLC's net margin of 0.02%. BP PLC's return on equity of 0.46% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

BP PLC has a consensus price target of $38.30, signalling upside risk potential of 14.71%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $138.92 which suggests that it could grow by 9.62%. Given that BP PLC has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe BP PLC is more attractive than Phillips 66.

BP PLC has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

BP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. BP PLC pays 1313.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BP PLC's is not.

BP PLC quarterly revenues are $45.8B, which are larger than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. BP PLC's net income of -$2B is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, BP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 406.20x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP PLC is 0.49x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell PLC has a net margin of -4.28% compared to BP PLC's net margin of 1.4%. BP PLC's return on equity of 0.46% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.62%.

BP PLC has a consensus price target of $38.30, signalling upside risk potential of 14.71%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $74.58 which suggests that it could grow by 8.44%. Given that BP PLC has higher upside potential than Shell PLC, analysts believe BP PLC is more attractive than Shell PLC.

BP PLC has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.967%.

BP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. BP PLC pays 1313.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 53.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BP PLC's is not.

BP PLC quarterly revenues are $45.8B, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $66.3B. BP PLC's net income of -$2B is lower than Shell PLC's net income of $928M. Notably, BP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 406.20x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP PLC is 0.49x versus 0.78x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of -4.28% compared to BP PLC's net margin of 9.39%. BP PLC's return on equity of 0.46% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

BP PLC has a consensus price target of $38.30, signalling upside risk potential of 14.71%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $129.33 which suggests that it could grow by 18.51%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than BP PLC, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than BP PLC.

BP PLC has a beta of 0.586, which suggesting that the stock is 41.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.826, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.351%.

BP PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.62%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. BP PLC pays 1313.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but BP PLC's is not.

BP PLC quarterly revenues are $45.8B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. BP PLC's net income of -$2B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, BP PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 406.20x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BP PLC is 0.49x versus 1.38x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.