CR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 20.9% compared to Crane's net margin of 6.57%. Crane's return on equity of 19.75% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.94%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $173.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $62.30 which suggests that it could grow by 47.21%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Crane.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.198%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Crane's net income of $81M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $77.5M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 19.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.89x versus 1.23x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graco has a net margin of 20.9% compared to Crane's net margin of 19.81%. Crane's return on equity of 19.75% beat Graco's return on equity of 20.13%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $173.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $88.14 which suggests that it could grow by 11.62%. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Graco.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.38%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Graco offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are smaller than Graco quarterly revenues of $548.7M. Crane's net income of $81M is lower than Graco's net income of $108.7M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Graco's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.89x versus 6.44x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 20.9% compared to Crane's net margin of -814.55%. Crane's return on equity of 19.75% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $173.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.394%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Crane's net income of $81M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.89x versus 6.55x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 20.9% compared to Crane's net margin of -11.09%. Crane's return on equity of 19.75% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $173.91, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 394.2%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Crane.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.084%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.6%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $387.5M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Crane's net income of $81M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.07x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 3.89x versus 0.19x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.