FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crane has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 20.9%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.94% beat Crane's return on equity of 19.75%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.30, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand Crane has an analysts' consensus of $173.91 which suggests that it could grow by 22.46%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Crane.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Crane offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane pays out 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Crane quarterly revenues of $387.5M. Flowserve's net income of $77.5M is lower than Crane's net income of $81M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.78x while Crane's PE ratio is 28.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.23x versus 3.89x for Crane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graco has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 19.81%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.94% beat Graco's return on equity of 20.13%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.30, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $88.14 which suggests that it could grow by 11.62%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.38%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Graco offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $548.7M. Flowserve's net income of $77.5M is lower than Graco's net income of $108.7M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.78x while Graco's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.23x versus 6.44x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 14.28%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.94% beat IDEX's return on equity of 13.71%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.30, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand IDEX has an analysts' consensus of $210.46 which suggests that it could grow by 25.91%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than IDEX, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than IDEX.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.071%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. IDEX offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX pays out 40.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than IDEX quarterly revenues of $862.9M. Flowserve's net income of $77.5M is lower than IDEX's net income of $123.2M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.78x while IDEX's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.23x versus 3.88x for IDEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -814.55%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.94% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $62.30, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.198% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.394%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.99%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Flowserve's net income of $77.5M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.78x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.23x versus 6.32x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.