AME Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 21.98% compared to AMETEK's net margin of 6.57%. AMETEK's return on equity of 14.91% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.94%.

AMETEK has a consensus price target of $190.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.73%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $63.50 which suggests that it could grow by 52.17%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than AMETEK, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than AMETEK.

AMETEK has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.222, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.198%.

AMETEK has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Flowserve offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. AMETEK pays 18.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AMETEK quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.2B. AMETEK's net income of $387.3M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $77.5M. Notably, AMETEK's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 19.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMETEK is 5.28x versus 1.21x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graco has a net margin of 21.98% compared to AMETEK's net margin of 19.81%. AMETEK's return on equity of 14.91% beat Graco's return on equity of 20.13%.

AMETEK has a consensus price target of $190.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.73%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $88.14 which suggests that it could grow by 12.17%. Given that AMETEK has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe AMETEK is more attractive than Graco.

AMETEK has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.38%.

AMETEK has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Graco offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. AMETEK pays 18.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AMETEK quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $548.7M. AMETEK's net income of $387.3M is higher than Graco's net income of $108.7M. Notably, AMETEK's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while Graco's PE ratio is 27.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMETEK is 5.28x versus 6.41x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 21.98% compared to AMETEK's net margin of -814.55%. AMETEK's return on equity of 14.91% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

AMETEK has a consensus price target of $190.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.73%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AMETEK has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe AMETEK is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

AMETEK has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.394%.

AMETEK has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AMETEK pays 18.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMETEK's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AMETEK quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. AMETEK's net income of $387.3M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, AMETEK's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMETEK is 5.28x versus 6.50x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rockwell Automation has a net margin of 21.98% compared to AMETEK's net margin of 9.78%. AMETEK's return on equity of 14.91% beat Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.25%.

AMETEK has a consensus price target of $190.52, signalling upside risk potential of 20.73%. On the other hand Rockwell Automation has an analysts' consensus of $279.89 which suggests that it could grow by 20.49%. Given that AMETEK has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe AMETEK is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

AMETEK has a beta of 1.136, which suggesting that the stock is 13.597% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.539%.

AMETEK has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Rockwell Automation offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. AMETEK pays 18.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation pays out 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AMETEK quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues of $1.9B. AMETEK's net income of $387.3M is higher than Rockwell Automation's net income of $184M. Notably, AMETEK's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.61x while Rockwell Automation's PE ratio is 28.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMETEK is 5.28x versus 3.27x for Rockwell Automation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.