EIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 44.9%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.51%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $338.6M. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 36.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 5.88x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of -65.47%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.169%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 0.32x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 0.49%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 49.18%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Employers Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Employers Holdings.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.691%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 1.16x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Employers Holdings's net margin of 10.88%. Employers Holdings's return on equity of 11.37% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03%.

Employers Holdings has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $91.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.51%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Employers Holdings, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Employers Holdings.

Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.953% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.503%.

Employers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Employers Holdings pays 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Employers Holdings quarterly revenues are $216.6M, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Employers Holdings's net income of $28.3M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $348.7M. Notably, Employers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 8.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Employers Holdings is 1.43x versus 1.16x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.