FIGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

G-III Apparel Group has a net margin of -1.21% compared to FIGS's net margin of 10.56%. FIGS's return on equity of 2.81% beat G-III Apparel Group's return on equity of 11.23%.

FIGS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand G-III Apparel Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.74%. Given that G-III Apparel Group has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe G-III Apparel Group is more attractive than FIGS.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 2.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.642%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-III Apparel Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-III Apparel Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $140.2M, which are smaller than G-III Apparel Group quarterly revenues of $1.1B. FIGS's net income of -$1.7M is lower than G-III Apparel Group's net income of $114.8M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.67x while G-III Apparel Group's PE ratio is 8.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.82x versus 0.49x for G-III Apparel Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -1.21% compared to FIGS's net margin of --. FIGS's return on equity of 2.81% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

FIGS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.54%. Given that FIGS has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe FIGS is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $140.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. FIGS's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.67x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.82x versus 276.79x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Movado Group has a net margin of -1.21% compared to FIGS's net margin of 2.76%. FIGS's return on equity of 2.81% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 4.69%.

FIGS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.72%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than FIGS, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than FIGS.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.083%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Movado Group offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 113.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $140.2M, which are smaller than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $182.7M. FIGS's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Movado Group's net income of $5.1M. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.67x while Movado Group's PE ratio is 19.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.82x versus 0.69x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -1.21% compared to FIGS's net margin of --. FIGS's return on equity of 2.81% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

FIGS has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1.2%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FIGS has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe FIGS is more attractive than Northann.

FIGS has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FIGS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FIGS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FIGS quarterly revenues are $140.2M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. FIGS's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, FIGS's price-to-earnings ratio is 93.67x while Northann's PE ratio is 37.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FIGS is 1.82x versus 0.46x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.