HCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Progressive has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 12.58%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $291.8235 which suggests that it could grow by 13.37%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than HCI Group.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.34x versus 1.93x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProAssurance has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 5.69%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand ProAssurance has an analysts' consensus of $20.33 which suggests that it could fall by -11.13%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than ProAssurance.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProAssurance has a beta of -0.088, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.754%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. ProAssurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. ProAssurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than ProAssurance quarterly revenues of $284.3M. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while ProAssurance's PE ratio is 22.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.34x versus 1.04x for ProAssurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hanover Insurance Group has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 10.64%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat The Hanover Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.06%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand The Hanover Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $182.86 which suggests that it could grow by 16.11%. Given that The Hanover Insurance Group has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe The Hanover Insurance Group is more attractive than HCI Group.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hanover Insurance Group has a beta of 0.467, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.286%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. The Hanover Insurance Group offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hanover Insurance Group pays out 29.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than The Hanover Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than The Hanover Insurance Group's net income of $167.9M. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while The Hanover Insurance Group's PE ratio is 13.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.34x versus 0.92x for The Hanover Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 9.48%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.4%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.32%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than HCI Group.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 11.999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.329, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.136%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.7M. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.44x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 11.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.34x versus 0.55x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.