LEVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of -17%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $29.56 which suggests that it could grow by 30.03%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.296%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $687.6M. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is higher than Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 6.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 0.98x versus 0.58x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Massimo Group has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of -1.7%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Massimo Group's return on equity of 15.31%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand Massimo Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Massimo Group.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Massimo Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Massimo Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Massimo Group quarterly revenues of $20.1M. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is higher than Massimo Group's net income of -$340.9K. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while Massimo Group's PE ratio is 32.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 0.98x versus 0.92x for Massimo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PVH has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 6.63%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat PVH's return on equity of 11.6%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand PVH has an analysts' consensus of $97.43 which suggests that it could grow by 35.96%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PVH has a beta of 1.892, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.171%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. PVH offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. PVH pays out 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than PVH quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is lower than PVH's net income of $157.2M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while PVH's PE ratio is 6.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 0.98x versus 0.47x for PVH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 9.17%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $18.61, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.30 which suggests that it could grow by 29.55%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.071, which suggesting that the stock is 7.132% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.38x while Tesla's PE ratio is 116.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 0.98x versus 8.52x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.