SHCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Civeo has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Soho House &'s net margin of -2.89%. Soho House &'s return on equity of -- beat Civeo's return on equity of 7.01%.

Soho House & has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Civeo has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 51.66%. Given that Civeo has higher upside potential than Soho House &, analysts believe Civeo is more attractive than Soho House &.

Soho House & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Civeo has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.525%.

Soho House & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Civeo offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Soho House & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Civeo pays out 24.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Civeo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Soho House & quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are larger than Civeo quarterly revenues of $176.3M. Soho House &'s net income of $175K is higher than Civeo's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Soho House &'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Civeo's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soho House & is 1.22x versus 0.45x for Civeo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Soho House &'s net margin of 7.44%. Soho House &'s return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

Soho House & has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $193.25 which suggests that it could grow by 4.58%. Given that Soho House & has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Soho House & is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Soho House & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.498%.

Soho House & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Soho House & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Soho House & quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Soho House &'s net income of $175K is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, Soho House &'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soho House & is 1.22x versus 1.91x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perfect Moment has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Soho House &'s net margin of --. Soho House &'s return on equity of -- beat Perfect Moment's return on equity of --.

Soho House & has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Perfect Moment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 476.92%. Given that Perfect Moment has higher upside potential than Soho House &, analysts believe Perfect Moment is more attractive than Soho House &.

Soho House & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perfect Moment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Soho House & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perfect Moment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soho House & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perfect Moment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soho House & quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are larger than Perfect Moment quarterly revenues of --. Soho House &'s net income of $175K is higher than Perfect Moment's net income of --. Notably, Soho House &'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perfect Moment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soho House & is 1.22x versus -- for Perfect Moment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marriott Vacations Worldwide has a net margin of 0.05% compared to Soho House &'s net margin of 6.44%. Soho House &'s return on equity of -- beat Marriott Vacations Worldwide's return on equity of 8.49%.

Soho House & has a consensus price target of $8.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.49%. On the other hand Marriott Vacations Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.78%. Given that Marriott Vacations Worldwide has higher upside potential than Soho House &, analysts believe Marriott Vacations Worldwide is more attractive than Soho House &.

Soho House & has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marriott Vacations Worldwide has a beta of 1.837, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.671%.

Soho House & has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marriott Vacations Worldwide offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Soho House & pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott Vacations Worldwide pays out 41.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Marriott Vacations Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Soho House & quarterly revenues are $333.4M, which are smaller than Marriott Vacations Worldwide quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Soho House &'s net income of $175K is lower than Marriott Vacations Worldwide's net income of $84M. Notably, Soho House &'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marriott Vacations Worldwide's PE ratio is 17.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soho House & is 1.22x versus 0.79x for Marriott Vacations Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.