SILA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Sila Realty Trust's net margin of 15.94%. Sila Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.94% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.4%.

Sila Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.98%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sila Realty Trust has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Sila Realty Trust is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Sila Realty Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.691%.

Sila Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sila Realty Trust pays 190.75% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sila Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $46.5M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.5M. Sila Realty Trust's net income of $11.1M is higher than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Sila Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 78.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sila Realty Trust is 7.73x versus 12.08x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Sila Realty Trust's net margin of 55.75%. Sila Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.94% beat Gaming and Leisure Properties's return on equity of 17.22%.

Sila Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.98%. On the other hand Gaming and Leisure Properties has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.4%. Given that Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher upside potential than Sila Realty Trust, analysts believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more attractive than Sila Realty Trust.

Sila Realty Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.703%.

Sila Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Gaming and Leisure Properties offers a yield of 6.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Sila Realty Trust pays 190.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 105.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sila Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $46.5M, which are smaller than Gaming and Leisure Properties quarterly revenues of $389.6M. Sila Realty Trust's net income of $11.1M is lower than Gaming and Leisure Properties's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Sila Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while Gaming and Leisure Properties's PE ratio is 16.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sila Realty Trust is 7.73x versus 8.52x for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manhattan Bridge Capital has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Sila Realty Trust's net margin of 70.33%. Sila Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.94% beat Manhattan Bridge Capital's return on equity of 12.96%.

Sila Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.98%. On the other hand Manhattan Bridge Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.33%. Given that Manhattan Bridge Capital has higher upside potential than Sila Realty Trust, analysts believe Manhattan Bridge Capital is more attractive than Sila Realty Trust.

Sila Realty Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manhattan Bridge Capital has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.032%.

Sila Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Manhattan Bridge Capital offers a yield of 9.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Sila Realty Trust pays 190.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital pays out 93.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Manhattan Bridge Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sila Realty Trust's is not.

Sila Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $46.5M, which are larger than Manhattan Bridge Capital quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Sila Realty Trust's net income of $11.1M is higher than Manhattan Bridge Capital's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Sila Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while Manhattan Bridge Capital's PE ratio is 9.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sila Realty Trust is 7.73x versus 7.53x for Manhattan Bridge Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBA Communications has a net margin of 23.88% compared to Sila Realty Trust's net margin of 25.03%. Sila Realty Trust's return on equity of 2.94% beat SBA Communications's return on equity of --.

Sila Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $28.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.98%. On the other hand SBA Communications has an analysts' consensus of $249.41 which suggests that it could grow by 13.79%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than Sila Realty Trust, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than Sila Realty Trust.

Sila Realty Trust has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBA Communications has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.905%.

Sila Realty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. SBA Communications offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. Sila Realty Trust pays 190.75% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications pays out 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sila Realty Trust's is not.

Sila Realty Trust quarterly revenues are $46.5M, which are smaller than SBA Communications quarterly revenues of $693.7M. Sila Realty Trust's net income of $11.1M is lower than SBA Communications's net income of $173.6M. Notably, Sila Realty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.95x while SBA Communications's PE ratio is 31.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sila Realty Trust is 7.73x versus 8.84x for SBA Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.