NKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 25%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.29%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $81.85, signalling upside risk potential of 23.01%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $213.85 which suggests that it could grow by 73.9%. Given that Deckers Outdoor has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Deckers Outdoor is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.9%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $456.7M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.11x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.08x versus 3.83x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 4.49%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.73%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $81.85, signalling upside risk potential of 23.01%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $79.85 which suggests that it could grow by 39.23%. Given that Skechers USA has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Skechers USA is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.154%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Skechers USA's net income of $99.3M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.11x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 13.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.08x versus 0.98x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 9.17%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $81.85, signalling upside risk potential of 23.01%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $335.61 which suggests that it could grow by 16.47%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Tesla.

Nike has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Nike's net income of $794M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.11x while Tesla's PE ratio is 141.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.08x versus 10.31x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 0.09%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $81.85, signalling upside risk potential of 23.01%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 52.5%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.019, which suggesting that the stock is 1.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.439%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Under Armour's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.11x while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 2.08x versus 0.53x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.