Is It Time for Costco to Split?
Costco’s stock price has experienced enormous growth over the last…
Sell
7
CGUI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.15
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$25.13 - $25.14
52-week range:
$25.03 - $25.31
Dividend yield:
2.62%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
31.6K
Avg. volume:
11.7K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSQA
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
|
$25.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 2.62% | -- |
|
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
|
$49.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 5.11% | -- |
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
$100.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 1.98% | -- |
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
$24.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 4.97% | -- |
|
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd
|
$24.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 6.88% | -- |
|
PSQA
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF
|
$20.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.45% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | 0.078 | -- | -- |
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.032 | -- | -- |
|
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd
|
-- | 0.092 | -- | -- |
|
PSQA
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGUI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BKUI
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSQA
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGUI or BKUI?
BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- BKUIBNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGUI or BKUI?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF, analysts believe Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 BKUIBNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGUI or BKUI More Risky?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGUI or BKUI?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF offers a yield of 5.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGUI or BKUI?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- BKUIBNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGUI or CSHP?
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGUI or CSHP?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF, analysts believe Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGUI or CSHP More Risky?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGUI or CSHP?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGUI or CSHP?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- CSHPiShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGUI or FLUD?
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGUI or FLUD?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF, analysts believe Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGUI or FLUD More Risky?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGUI or FLUD?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGUI or FLUD?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- FLUDFranklin Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGUI or IGBH?
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- IGBHiShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGUI or IGBH?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd, analysts believe Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 IGBHiShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd0 0 0 -
Is CGUI or IGBH More Risky?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.568%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGUI or IGBH?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGUI or IGBH?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- IGBHiShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corp Bd-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGUI or PSQA?
Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- PSQAPalmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGUI or PSQA?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF, analysts believe Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 PSQAPalmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGUI or PSQA More Risky?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGUI or PSQA?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGUI or PSQA?
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGUICapital Group Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- PSQAPalmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FedEx’s Spinoff Boost Its Stock Price?
In a pre-holiday surprise announcement, management at FedEx (NYSE:FDX) released…
Why Is Buffett Buying Verisign?
Warren Buffett has spent 2024 stockpiling cash, even going so…
Stock Ideas
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Sell
48
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
77
FTAI alert for Jan 1
FTAI Aviation [FTAI] is up 13.87% over the past day.
Buy
56
QMCO alert for Jan 1
Quantum [QMCO] is down 13.43% over the past day.
Buy
60
ARQQ alert for Jan 1
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is down 10.6% over the past day.
