K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 12.92%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.45%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.14%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.046%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Kellanova's net income of $365M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while General Mills's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.23x versus 1.71x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 5.28%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat Ingredion's return on equity of 16.87%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.45%. On the other hand Ingredion has an analysts' consensus of $153.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.89%. Given that Ingredion has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Ingredion is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion has a beta of 0.716, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.388%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Ingredion offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion pays out 32.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Ingredion quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Kellanova's net income of $365M is higher than Ingredion's net income of $95M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while Ingredion's PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.23x versus 1.17x for Ingredion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 32.41%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.45%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $32.59 which suggests that it could grow by 9.79%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.572%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Kellanova's net income of $365M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.23x versus 1.40x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 5.48%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.45%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $162.96 which suggests that it could grow by 11.15%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Kellanova's net income of $365M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.25x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.23x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.