CRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of 29.06%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $61.62, signalling upside risk potential of 79.48%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $200.20 which suggests that it could grow by 55.19%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.265%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. California Resources's net income of $33M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.95x versus 2.50x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of 7.52%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat Murphy Oil's return on equity of 7.46%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $61.62, signalling upside risk potential of 79.48%. On the other hand Murphy Oil has an analysts' consensus of $32.94 which suggests that it could grow by 57.84%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Murphy Oil, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Murphy Oil.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murphy Oil has a beta of 1.686, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.635%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Murphy Oil offers a yield of 5.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are larger than Murphy Oil quarterly revenues of $669.6M. California Resources's net income of $33M is lower than Murphy Oil's net income of $50.3M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Murphy Oil's PE ratio is 7.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.95x versus 1.04x for Murphy Oil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of 14.22%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $61.62, signalling upside risk potential of 79.48%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $40.91 which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.162%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are larger than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $667M. California Resources's net income of $33M is lower than Range Resources's net income of $94.8M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 30.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.95x versus 3.45x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vital Energy has a net margin of 3.57% compared to California Resources's net margin of -67.26%. California Resources's return on equity of 14.03% beat Vital Energy's return on equity of -6.12%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $61.62, signalling upside risk potential of 79.48%. On the other hand Vital Energy has an analysts' consensus of $28.64 which suggests that it could grow by 109.18%. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vital Energy has a beta of 2.823, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.26%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.29%. Vital Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Resources pays 30.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Vital Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $924M, which are larger than Vital Energy quarterly revenues of $534.4M. California Resources's net income of $33M is higher than Vital Energy's net income of -$359.4M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.35x while Vital Energy's PE ratio is 2.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 0.95x versus 0.26x for Vital Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.