CRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 34.85% compared to California Resources's net margin of 28.53%. California Resources's return on equity of 22.28% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 24.93%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $145.21 which suggests that it could grow by 21.98%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than EOG Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.345%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. California Resources pays 14.36% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 44.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $990M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.9B. California Resources's net income of $345M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.7B. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.96x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.45x versus 2.88x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 34.85% compared to California Resources's net margin of 9.43%. California Resources's return on equity of 22.28% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.25%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. California Resources pays 14.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. California Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $990M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. California Resources's net income of $345M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.96x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 35.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.45x versus 1.87x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of 34.85% compared to California Resources's net margin of 57.9%. California Resources's return on equity of 22.28% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 37.17%. Given that Northern Oil & Gas has higher upside potential than California Resources, analysts believe Northern Oil & Gas is more attractive than California Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.144%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. California Resources pays 14.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $990M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $515.5M. California Resources's net income of $345M is higher than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.96x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.45x versus 1.66x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 34.85% compared to California Resources's net margin of 8.92%. California Resources's return on equity of 22.28% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 12.83%.

California Resources has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.49%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $35.35 which suggests that it could grow by 6.53%. Given that California Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe California Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

California Resources has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.101%.

California Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. California Resources pays 14.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 8.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California Resources quarterly revenues are $990M, which are larger than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $567.9M. California Resources's net income of $345M is higher than Range Resources's net income of $50.7M. Notably, California Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.96x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 16.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Resources is 1.45x versus 3.42x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.