RRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expand Energy has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of -19.96%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -6%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.04%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $123.56 which suggests that it could grow by 20.85%. Given that Range Resources has higher upside potential than Expand Energy, analysts believe Range Resources is more attractive than Expand Energy.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2B. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$399M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.37x versus 3.87x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 21.93%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.31%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.04%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $68.29 which suggests that it could grow by 70.61%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 2.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 174.1%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $978.3M. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $214.5M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.37x versus 1.43x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 22.53%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.04%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $40.93 which suggests that it could grow by 85.89%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 3.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.328%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.37x versus 0.95x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 9.39%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.92% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $40.14, signalling upside risk potential of 23.04%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $125.06 which suggests that it could grow by 18.71%. Given that Range Resources has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Range Resources is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $667M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Range Resources's net income of $94.8M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.65x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.37x versus 1.33x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.